Knowledge Core

Winning PITCHES? It’s not what they tell you, it’s what you DISCOVER


The days when sales teams held the power as the ‘keepers of the product knowledge’ are gone. As it was then termed, caveat emptor (buyer beware) ruled. With the web that’s all changed and, as Dan Pynk says, “It’s now caveat venditor” (seller beware).

In relation to tenders and competitive proposals, our prospects have done their research on the web, they’ve read reviews or testimonials about you and your competitors and spoken to their networks about who’s who (and importantly had discussions with companies that have had 1st hand experience of working with you).

They know what they want and they’ve already developed a reasonable scenario for what they want and who can provide that (aka who is going to win ‘the gig’). All of this is done before the RFT has gone out, or the company has been asked for a proposal.

Now this isn’t the case all of the time, but it happens more often than it doesn’t. What I do know is this:

When we turn down the volume on what they are saying and look instead at their behaviours we have a much more strategic approach. In short, we sit with clients and ask:

  • Why are they considering moving from the current state of play?
  • What are they looking for that they currently aren’t getting?
  • Yes they have asked for you to submit a response but why are they speaking to you?
  • What issues aren’t actually being addressed that have them going out to the market?
  • What are their specific “value for money” drivers (that aren’t related to cost)?

It’s an old cliché that not everything that sparkles is gold. It’s the same with being invited to tender. It’s expensive both in financial outlay to develop the pitch as well as soft dollar costs (time and effort). It’s time consuming and win rates sit around the 15-35%. You fill in the rest…

Proposal/ tender submission processes are like the proverbial iceberg: the RFT is only the very visible tip. So much that lies beneath winning lies in tackling the unspoken agendas, the unspoken expectations and the unspoken risk drivers.

Let me say,  ‘caveat venditor’ to those that don’t address the “unspoken”.

Author: Adette Goldberg

LinkedIn – Writing a Winning Executive Summary for your RFPs

For many, Proposal Executive Summaries form the single most important part of the document. It’s the section that brings your solution to life – often the only section of the document Leadership will read – leaving others to determine whether the rest of the document is compliant or not; and whether it gets through to the next stage.

And yet… it’s the section that is the most boiler-plated, rehashed and disrespected.

Now, don’t get caught by the word ‘Summary’. It isn’t a summary of your submission. Its role is to present your value proposition – to do nothing short of defining those differentiators which press their hot buttons. Treat this section with the utmost respect. It is your overview, your management case. It needs to be compelling, dominant, persuasive, benefits-driven, visionary. It’s the section that sells you.

And yet… a room of 350 proposal specialists burst into laughter when asked to share ‘the worst introductory exec summary openings of all time’ they’d come across. Maybe you’ve encountered some of the examples they gave, below (or derivations) – I know I have, all too often:

  1. Thank you for the opportunity to …
  2. We are pleased to submit …
  3. We are a premier/preeminent/market leading firm in …
  4. Regarding your request for proposal (RFP), [your company] is thrilled about the opportunity to provide you [type of service requested]. Having worked with [brief list of past clients], we believe a partnership with [company you’re writing to] would have a tremendous impact on your customer satisfaction and bottom line.

So we see what doesn’t work. But what does?

As I’ve said, the primary role of an executive summary is to sell (or to use another word, persuade). Yet beware of using the word ‘sales’ – the US Defence will often rip out the executive summary because they think it’s a sales document full of corporate puffery or marketing guff. This section needs to have looked at it from their perspective and provide:

  • The benefits of your solution for them
  • Your approach
  • The ‘customer value’ solution
  • Your differentiators (and please ensure they are substantiated and summarised)

A good proposal won’t necessarily win you the work, but a ‘bad one’ can very quickly kick you out of the race. Something to remember is that when they are evaluating the proposals received, their main goal is to weed out the ones that aren’t compliant. They are looking to see whether:

  • You listened
  • You read the questions in the RFP
  • You understand what they need – truly need
  • You will give them what they need
  • They can trust your solution

Ergo, boilerplate cut and paste summaries simply won’t cut the grade.

Some Cardinal Don’ts for putting together your executive summary

  • Don’t have it be generic and filled with boilerplate text
  • Don’t refer to your business up front – it’s not about you . Address their business issues
  • Don’t reuse/rehash text from previous proposals

Make sure you:

  • Begin by defining the most important problem for the buyer, and then focus on the commercial benefits of solving this problem for them
  • Incorporate your value propositions and differentiators – and make sure they are useful and specific to this project
  • Stay away from vague generalities
  • Use too much jargon or sales and marketing guff

As Albert Einstein says..

If I had an hour to solve a problem I’d spend 55 minutes thinking about the problem and 5 minutes thinking about solutions.”

It’s the same with executive summaries. I will spend the majority of the time focused on developing the solution for them, framed to their issues, which defines our differentiators. Only then do I start writing. There is nothing more disrespectful than receiving a document that isn’t even written for the reader …

A picture paints a 1,000 words BUT a 1,000 words will bore you to death


How many of you have been subjected to what could have been a magnificent presentation/product launch/change initiative which in fact turned out to be a less than ‘riveting’ monologue?

Picture this, two presenters both brilliant in their field, both possessing great ‘technical depth’ both with very little presentation experience. And when they did present, you would see them both either reading their notes in front of them or the text off the slides, whilst standing behind the podium trotting out their technical prowess.

So we have Steve who brilliant but when nervous speaks in monotonously, long sentences filled with looong words – proliferated with technical jargon, that could to some be construed as mumbling to himself rather than presenting to a group … the nutty professor comes to mind

Then there’s Nick, whose very nervous of presenting, considered intense by some in the office, who as he gets more nervous digs further into the detail completely missing the objective of the presentation.

The issue was that the company needed their presentation to connect, inspire, excite and motivate the audience to action, the stage was global, and, they only had ½ an hour.

Where it began, was a focus on the technical detail.  I bet that’s never happened at your organisation.

So what are the elements of a high impact presentation …

  • First and foremost, ensure the context is right for the audience,
  • focus on delivering a presentation that is outcome based, here is where you need to ask yourself, what do you want your audience to leave the presentation doing, thinking, believing, wanting more of, less of, differently or better
  • It really doesn’t matter what you want to say, it’s about what the audience needs to hear because remember unless it’s a technical workshop a large component of the presenter’s role is to inspire the audience, engage them in the potential and often create possibilities for them
  • We live in a day and age where imagery is rich, powerful and accessible, I’ll be blunt here, I’d recommend you use it

And lastly, for this level of audience with this kind of intent understand that you need to invest around 8 hours of preparation time for 30 minutes of delivery. Anything less than that a you will have undercooked it, risking that death by that 1000 words.

The Outcome

Oh and of those of you wondering how Steve and Nick went, their presentation was considered one of two of the best at the global conference.

For those of you who want to watch a perfect example of how not to deliver a presentation here is a fabulous video. 

Neuroscience explains why it’s a zoo in there…

When advisers speak to clients about their investments they often explain how and why the fall in share prices will pass – and how and why their shares will regain value.  They show clients statistics, charts and graphs to prove that times are changing and portfolios will rise.  Despite this, clients shut down and start exhibiting counterproductive behaviours. Paradoxically, the more statistics, charts and graphs the adviser produces to reinforce his or her opinion, the more clients dig their heels in and make seemingly illogical decisions.

Cognitive Neuroscience concludes that 95% of our brain computation is unconscious and emotion driven. Nevertheless, people believe that their emotions and value judgements are facts based on logic. Furthermore, emotional reasoning assumes that what we are feeling is true and that the stronger the emotion the more true it is. In the main, we take these automatic thoughts as truisms and base our decisions on them, drawing on language to justify the decisions.

Since people aren’t trained in mastering their emotions in times of stress, most of the time they do not think critically and rationally. Their ‘reality’ overrides the generally accepted rule that ‘feelings aren’t facts’ – thus, what they feel becomes ‘the truth’.

Why is it that perfectly rational, intelligent clients often make irrational decisions? The answer lies in the brain, and the ‘zoo’ that sits in there. It’s a wildlife park in there! And it is where the decisions are made, especially financial decisions.  Let me explain…

Dr Paul Maclean’s Triune Brain

In the 1960s, Dr Paul Maclean established the current model of the brain, termed the ‘Triune Brain, to describe how the interplay of our emotions, thoughts and behaviours determines all of our decisions in the world – including our financial decisions. The brain has 3 distinct areas that co-operatively help us function at our maximum potential:

Reptilian Complex Brain – The Crocodile

  • The oldest part of the brain which is purely instinctual. It deals with survival.
  • Its role is controlling our reflexes, breathing and heartbeat.
  • Its singular focus is on survival, and it is activated when a threat is perceived.
  • This is the only part of the brain that runs automatically whether we are asleep or awake and it isn’t under Human control!
  • The reptilian brain makes decisions for us and then rationalises those decisions.
  • Although it takes input from the other 2 parts of the brain, it controls the final decision-making process.

Limbic System, Mammalian Brain – The Monkey

  • This encloses the reptilian brain and because of where it sits, it controls our hormones.
  • Because it houses the Amygdala it’s the area that creates and stores memories related to our emotional experiences. It’s the part of the brain that’s imperative for relationship forming.
  • This is the area that influences our behaviour and motivation.
  • The Limbic system processes our emotions and gut feelings. By joining feelings to instincts it classifies everything as either ‘good’ or ‘bad’.

Neocortex, the Rational Thinking Brain – Mr Spock

  • This is the rational, analytical part of the brain that creates our thoughts, language, hopes, dreams and goals. It also decodes sensory information.
  • It controls speech and self consciousness, and rationally assesses situations and ideas.
  • It is also responsible for organising, planning and controlling the more primal impulses of the brain
  • It processes rational data and shares its deductions with the other 2 brains.

What does this have to do with money and financial planning?

All of this has a lot to do with money and financial planning.  In human beings, money and social status are linked to survival. When our survival mechanism gets triggered, the animal brain frantically makes connections between the current scenario and past experiences, and bases decisions on these experiences as well as residual remembered emotions.

This is why when we face something unexpected, our fear-based anxiety levels rise and the animal brain interprets this as danger.  When this occurs, the linkages between the rational and animal part of the brain close down.  The only role the rational brain then has is to make up the narrative to explain what is happening and to make decisions about what to do in this situation.

Next, the rational brain goes into instant shut-down; Mr Spock is removed from the decision-making process — leaving the crocodile and the monkey in charge.

Simply put, the animal brain is faster and more powerful than the rational brain. It has its own circuitry. It doesn’t rely on other parts of the brain to function. Because its role is to ensure our survival, the amygdala acts as the guard dog to the gates of the brain, and protects us from danger. Its decision criteria is ‘fight’ or ‘flight’, and self-defeating financial behaviours stem from this.

Someone in fight mode blames, and logic is shut down. They are looking for someone to blame for their fear ridden situation; the bank for lending them the money, the financial planner for recommending the strategy etc.  When we are in fight mode we don’t want to take personal responsibility. The brain just wants to blame, threaten, sue, lash out and the result is – aggressive behaviour, either overt or covert.

Someone in flight mode wants to get as far away from the stressor as possible. In this scenario the client is going to sell the shares immediately, or any other action consistent with the ‘cut and run’ model.

Then there’s freeze mode which is when overwhelm kicks in and clients take no action. They shut down and stop looking at investments, stop following the news, ignore recommendations from advisers. When clients are in freeze mode they are literally immobilised – overwhelmed and fearful.

Add to this information the phenomenon of Loss Aversion

Kahneman & Tversky researched the psychology of decision making and uncovered the phenomenon of ‘Loss Aversion’ which is that it is twice as painful emotionally to lose something than it is to hope for a potential gain.

Loss aversion makes us irrational when it comes to evaluating risk. It is the fear of loss that drives us into illogical decisions like liquidating shares into cash.  Loss aversion ensures we stop taking rational risks because we focus far too much on the possibility of loss without considering the probability and potential positive outcomes.

Emotionally, hanging onto what we’ve got as long as it’s enough for survival is far more important to us than the potential of making money in the future. This fear of loss, this loss aversion, also explains why we’ll hang onto shares as their share prices fall and sell once the share price is rising.  We simply don’t want to accept the loss.

When our decisions are driven by survival based emotions, the decisions are the least practical and relevant. In fact Antonio Demasio discovered that people who couldn’t access emotions due to neurological issues made significantly more money than ‘normal’ subjects. The subjects with neurological issues gambled 85.2% of the time after loss. Losing money made them more likely to re-invest because they realised that investing was the best way to recoup their losses. Not listening to their emotions gave them a crucial advantage.

As advisers, what can you do?

  1. Recognise that the client is in emotional lockup and that the brain is inclined to act irrationally.
  2. As funny as it sounds, actually help clients to take a few deep breaths. Breathing deeply slows the system down and helps the brain to come back on-line, bringing the reasoning part of brain back into action. It helps to slowdown the reptilian (non thinking brain).
  3. By helping clients strengthen their mammalian brain, advisers can help clients evaluate the accuracy of their thinking by showing them the evidence and by engaging them in questions. What’s the evidence that the world is going to come crashing down? Is there a better explanation? What’s the worst thing that could happen? What will happen if they do take their money out? Or put it under their mattress? Or stash it in the freezer? Or let it halve in term deposits?
  4. Don’t give clients the opportunity to make rash decisions. As it takes 20 minutes to calm the animal brain to enable the rational brain to take control; ensure that there is a delay between their emotional reaction and their decision making.  Give them the 20 minutes to redirect the power to the neocortex (thinking brain).

Train their brain to anticipate the market… let them know…

The emotional brain can be trained to suppress its hardwired survival responses and clients’ long-term financial health is dependent on their ability to do that.Training will help them master their responses in times of stress. By way of example, horses are animals that are easily scared and they must be trained to remain calm in crowds so when they are faced with an angry crowd they won’t be spooked.  In the same way, our police and defence forces are trained to remain calm in a crisis so that their rational responses are optimised.

Similarly, we can train clients to recognise potentially stressful financial situations before they occur so they are prepared to have their rational brain step in or exert control over the animal brain. It is good for them to understand their emotional responses to stress – for example sweating, an ill feeling in the pit of the stomach, an inability to remain still and other signs of anxiety. Each person has a different physiological reaction to the levels of hormones released during stress and research has shown that the body registers stress and fear long before the rational mind is aware of it. If the client can recognise these symptoms they can take appropriate action.

After delivering what you believe is ‘negative news’, request that the client takes ten deep breaths while they think about the news (and perhaps you can join them in this). By creating this break between reaction and action you are giving their rational brain time to step in. Remember, intense emotions overwhelm the brain. It’s like a flood of emotions.  Creating a gap enables the brain to stand still.

As a financial planner you can train your clients by drills about how shares move and the standard deviation they might expect on their returns. For example, ‘You should expect it to go up x% and down by y%, and that’s normal’. If you have pre-conditioned your client with this logic, when their fear kicks in, their minds won’t panic because the logical mind will stay in control.

Some general guidelines

Numbers bamboozle the brain and speak directly to the neocortex.  Although it is the most logical part of the brain it has the least amount of power in the decision-making process.  Research now shows that if the brain is given a highly challenging and complex problem, its computing path takes misleading shortcuts to chunk the information.  By doing this it hopes to make the information more manageable. Whilst this process is underway we start to make irrational decisions and the brain’s preferences lead us to make poor decisions. In short, it is not wise to bombard clients with facts!

“We sing the praises of logic and facts. We applaud information and its offshoot, making informed decisions. What we forget is the prefrontal cortex’s limitations. The more we are overloaded with facts, the worse our decisions become.”

The brain functions and stores information relationally, our memories are stored in a form that captures the essence of the conversation and the moment rather than the specific details. Our brain literally remembers and learns through stories.

The key to helping your clients to make better decisions is to ensure you have a range of stories or metaphors that you can draw on in discussions with them. In this way you move them away from the fight/flight options.

Feelings aren’t facts… but they certainly are a reality…

You need to understand the emotional dynamics of decision-making and train your clients from the outset.  If you put too much emphasis on charts and facts, you are dismissing their emotions. Remember, it is emotions which drive decision-making; not logic.  Remember that if you drag out the charts and quote figures you will appear to be dismissing their feelings, and when someone’s feelings are dismissed they shut down. It is as simple as that. Instead, the best option is to take a different approach:

  1. Reach for the forms, and as you start speaking to them, begin to discuss the realities of losing their savings – helping them to discern reality vs panic.
  2. With their life expectancy sitting at say 17-20 years, discuss the realities of the share market not rising again based on history of the market over the past 100 years; or if they believe that XYZ Company is going to go ‘broke’ in that time.
  3. Highlight the returns and benefits of stockpiling the retirement funds under the pillow versus the returns term deposits deliver over the long term (Rule of 72).
  4. Give the animal brain time to settle and the neocortex time to emerge and return to rational thinking.

When we try to change someone’s mind, especially one driven by fear, the brain literally shuts down. It pushes back and stops taking in the information. The first step is to understand what the brain does and why we as humans act in seemingly irrational ways when our primal needs are triggered. Part of the adviser’s role is, I believe, to empower clients to deal with the natural fluctuations of the market and life’s stressors by providing them with the tools to do so. By training our clients’ brains, we are preparing them to remain calm in the face of overwhelming feelings. In this way both advisor and client create a relationship that equips them to make decisions in the client’s best interests at all times, no matter the circumstances.

Author: Adette Goldberg

Adette guides companies through the tender, proposal and presentation process, and over the past 2 years has worked on and won 17 of the last 20; delivering an 85% win rate for her clients. Unique in her field, Adette’s approach focuses on the ‘unspoken’ (what’s not being said, yet to be discovered and used as a winning tool), the relationships, and the entire decision-making process. In short, she loves the hunt!

Get informed


Brain Box

Technology is terrible for relationships… Just as Simon Sinek says

How do clients determine whether the relationship with their advisor is valuable to them? It’s by the level of usefulness they believe they presently gain, and will gain, from the interaction. This is commonly called a satisfaction rating. Individuals arrive at these ratings subjectively. Quantifying the relevant drivers of satisfaction is a challenge for firms. Remember, what we can’t measure we can’t manage.

So how do we begin to draw out and quantify these subjective drivers? I’m going to be contentious here. in my experience 50% of the relationship value is dependent upon the eventual level of ‘utility’ the advice provides my client whilst the other 50% is based on relationship drivers that are important to the client. The relationship drivers indicate the level of trust the client has in the performance of the advisor.

Simon Sinek’s video “The Human in Humanity” speaks to the 50% based on the relationship drivers, he focuses on trust. He strongly suggests that trust diminishes within organisations, and with clients and customers when the organisation and/or the advisor stops focussing on human interactions and puts more focus on profits and the bottom line.

Although, as Simon says, technology is wonderful for building connections and transactions, it is terrible for human connection. And with that, building trust. I’m often reminded that clients remain clients because of the trust they have built with your firm through the interactions you have with them – not from seeing the usefulness and relevance of what and how you provide the service to them.
I’d love to hear your thoughts on this…


Get informed


Are you really willing to lose customers to your competitors?

For thousands of years a fundamental part of our human hunter-gatherer psyche was stalking prey. And even today in our civilised, industrialised and urbanised society, it remains a fundamental part of our genetic DNA.

We see it at the highest government levels and also on the playing field where, despite the rhetoric, the hunt engenders a surge of emotion akin to those our ancestors must have felt (though they were playing for real).

As soon as you step into hunter mode, your customer feels like your prey

For many, selling triggers chemical surges similar to those of the hunt. We know that, because brain research links the instinctual aspect of stalking prey with far more cognitive cerebral (intellectual) activities which impact and reinforce our pitch or ‘selling style’.

In short we are:

  • fixated on what we’re going to say next to the customer/ client or prospect;
  • distracted with fantasising about targets we’ll reach from ‘closing’ the sale; and
  • sending strong messages about us that, in the end, our competitors will benefit from.

The issue is that in today’s world this particular style of selling loses more than it wins.

You see, when we focus on what we are going to get from a particular person, we become the hunter and they become the prey.

I don’t know about you, but if ever I feel like prey you can see the dust flying as I rush out of the room, whether physically or mentally. Call it the natural law of the universe, human perversity, or the perception that I’m under siege – either way that salesperson isn’t going to get a thing from me!

I wonder if you might be similar?

“Thanks so much, we’ll call you…”

Interestingly, the flip side of being the hunter is that for those customers who have become prey – the same aspect of the brain is triggered as if the person was genuinely being hunted. Quantum physicist Henry Stapp’s brain research found that when we try to convince someone to do something which argues with their own values, beliefs or opinions, the brain triggers warning signals that shuts the brain down. Which, in a sales environment, translates to “Thanks so much. We’ll call you.”

Brain research is a multi-faceted discipline but in this context let me just ask … how you would feel, knowing that the person sitting opposite you is only there because they are specifically out to get your business and your money?

I wonder how generous and magnanimous you would feel, knowing that you were there specifically to listen to someone trying to sell you their services and get you to part with your money?

And consider this: with the availability of technology the need for customers and prospects to sit and listen to a salesperson’s litany of product or service features is largely redundant. Because by the time each of them meet, the customer or prospect has probably done their homework.

Fact: online consumer research prior to purchase has now risen to between 80-97%.

The balance of power has changed to the buyer

They’ve done their research on your company, your products, and your competitors and if they are speaking to you, it’s often to assess whether your products or services are going to deliver them the specific level of satisfaction they are looking for.

Therefore a large part of their assessment is going to be based on your ability (or that of your sales staff) to uncover these specifics and clearly demonstrate the usefulness of your product or service to them.

The determining factor as to whether they buy from you will be based on your ability to uncover your prospect’s unspoken word and meet their personal paradigm of value.

Only those that are able to stand in that prospect’s shoes and understand his or her personal paradigm of value, get the sale, the deal or win the work.

The Takeout…

  • When you are in ‘hunter’ mode, it’s completely counterintuitive to what your 21st century customers are looking for.
  • If you are focused on your outcomes rather than those of your customers, the battle lines are drawn – and the enemy is within.
  • The proposition that customers are unknowledgeable and will bow to the force of the hunter technique is outdated.
  • Your customers are savvy. They have moved on. And they are looking to partner with salespeople they can trust and relate to well before they will invest.
  • You will succeed when you have a level of empathy that delivers the ability to understand your customer’s, prospect’s or client’s view of the world.

Has this sparked some thoughts? We’d love to hear them.

Get informed


The secrets to writing winning client testimonials


How do I get the best out of my testimonials?

78% of consumers will trust peer reviews but only 14% will trust a company’s marketing or advertising materials. What a consumer is buying is a promise. We are promising to solve their problems in a better way than they can solve themselves. Ultimately, because they’re buying a promise, they’re looking for proof. Proof that we will deliver the outcomes they need from our delivery of the service. Sadly because service is intangible, client can’t feel, touch or see it.

As a result, the client is looking for other cues so they can put value on the service offered. Testimonials are a fabulous way for us to differentiate ourselves. They attest to the value our clients see in us. They show what they have received from us. There are, however, two challenges in obtaining useful testimonials. The first challenge centres around how to ask a client to give a testimonial. The second challenge is how to ensure the testimonial differentiates your service form others. “She was great”, “He was fantastic” or “I’d use them again”, does not adequately cover your point of difference. It is not persuasive. To have pulling power, testimonials need to clearly articulate “What you said and did that led your clients to believe that you were fantastic?” What led your clients to believe that “You were great”?

I have found the secret to getting good testimonials – a testimonial that clearly articulates what makes you different. Just follow these 3 steps!

Step 1. Don’t ask your clients to write a testimonial. Instead, book a telephone appointment with them and then ask or talk about:

1) What are the benefits they’ve received by using you (get at least 3 or tree or 4 examples)

2) What were your skills that they thought were valuable? What outcome did they achieve?

3) If they were to refer you to a friend, what would they say about you?

These answers are vital for a client’s testimonial as they provide layered information. Although the information looks similar there are subtle, important differences.

Step 2. Using your client’s words and not yours, take that information and draft a testimonial.

Step 3. Ring them and explain how you used their comments to draft a testimonial and ask them if they would be happy to endorse it for you. Forward the draft copy to them for approval. This is your client’s testimonial. It will be a business winning client testimonial. It is guaranteed to differentiate you from your competitors.

We have an intangible service so testimonials are invaluable in providing certainty to potential clients. Peer reviews are a proven source of trusting referrals. I would love to hear more about YOUR testimonial gathering experience, or any feedback you have relating to these tips.

Get informed


Our marketing and business development strategies are based firmly on research.


We are far more than a Sydney market research agency. We are a partner in building your business. Market research, and its findings, only becomes relevant when it’s firmly linked to your business strategies and it uncovers how you can increase revenue by:

  • focusing on ways to deepen client relationships
  • identifying new business opportunities
  • highlighting new market opportunities or gaps in the sales process and relationship dynamics.

With over 26 years in business development and marketing, our methodologies are founded on the premise of bridging the divide between marketing and sales. We are constantly looking at how you can make more money and have more profitable relationships.
When we are researching, both qualitative and quantitative research techniques are implemented.
Our qualitative research process draws out the underlying subjective drivers that underpin decision-making, using a number of methods:

  • Observing participants
  • Interrogating field notes
  • Conducting, structured and semi- structured in-depth interviews with individuals
  • Holding focus groups, and
  • Analysing third party academic and industry research and commentary.

Our quantitative research process looks at the causal effects of variables, analysing the relationships between the different variables. This helps us determine which has the greatest impact and which will uncover the most relevant answers.
Our Client Research:

  • Gauges the pulse of the relationships
  • Looks at how and why clients leave interviews
  • Investigates proposals and tenders that have not gained business

We do this by ensuring that all communication bypasses subconscious pre-conceived perceptions and judgements that unwittingly undermine the success of:

  • your proposal,
  • your solution and

Our role is to ensure that the research outcomes we find optimise your firms ability to win more profitable work. It is for this reason that we stand by our Guarantee!

Our Guarantee
We guarantee not to deliver a formulaic approach. We will continually review and refine our approach to ensure our findings and recommendations are both relevant and current.

Get informed